REVENG: REVERSE ENGINEERING THE METABOLIC BIOLOGICAL PATHWAY

REVENG: REVERSE ENGINEERING THE METABOLIC BIOLOGICAL PATHWAY

June 2026, ISSX 16th European Meeting

Tommaso Palomba1, Savannah Mason1, Paula Cifuentes1,3, Ludovico Venturi1,2, Ismael Zamora1

1Mass Analytica, S.L., Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain; 2Molecular Discovery Ltd, Kinetic Business Centre, Borehamwood, UK; 3Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 08003, Spain

Abstract

Most drugs undergo chemical transformations in the body, known as biotransformations, to generate metabolites that are more readily eliminated. These reactions are primarily mediated by metabolic enzymes, mainly in the liver, and are highly specific, with each enzyme favoring particular substrates. Identifying the enzymes responsible for metabolite formation is essential for elucidating metabolic pathways, predicting metabolic behavior, and assessing potential toxicity risks. Metabolite Identification (MetID) studies, typically conducted in vitro or in vivo, rely heavily on LC-MS/MS for detecting and structurally characterizing metabolites. However, most discovery studies provide limited insight into the enzymes involved, and experimental approaches for reaction phenotyping, such as recombinant enzyme incubations or chemical inhibition studies, are often time- and resource-intensive, limiting comprehensive pathway characterization.

To address this gap, we developed a workflow that integrates LC-MS/MS MetID data from in vitro incubations with computational predictions to identify enzymatic pathways responsible for metabolite formation, including both Phase I and Phase II reactions. The computational approach simulates interactions between xenobiotic compounds and human metabolic enzymes using their 3D structures, evaluating the exposure of reactive atoms to catalytic residues. Multiple docking poses are generated and scored based on energy contributions, and the best pose is normalized to provide a probability ranking.

MetID data were processed using MassMetaSite on the ONIRO server with LC-MS/MS datasets from Sciex and Thermo instruments, and predictions were performed using MetaSite 7 within Oniro. The model was applied to three compounds and validated against experimental CYP phenotyping data from the literature.

For dextromethorphan, Phase I metabolism studies using recombinant enzymes and human liver microsomes identified six metabolites formed through N- and O-dealkylation and hydroxylation after 30 minutes. Experimentally, CYP2D6 mediated O-dealkylation to dextrorphan, while CYP3A4 catalyzed N-dealkylation to 3-methoxymorphinan. The model accurately predicted both pathways with high probability, consistent with the experimental results.¹

Phase II metabolism of dextromethorphan was further evaluated in hepatocytes, and revealed a metabolite formed via O-dealkylation followed by glucuronidation after 140 minutes; the model correctly suggested CYP2D6 for the initial step and UGT enzymes for conjugation, in agreement with literature reports.²

Two additional compounds were also assessed for Phase I metabolism: thioridazine metabolism in human liver microsomes produced metabolites via S-oxidation and N-demethylation, with the model identifying CYP3A4 for 5-sulfoxide formation and suggested CYP1A2 as one enzyme involved in N-demethylation. The model also predicted CYP2D6 involvement in the formation of mesoridazine and its further conversion to sulphoridazine, consistent with published data.³ ⁴

For ethoxyresorufin, incubated with recombinant enzymes for 30 minutes, O-dealkylation to resorufin was observed in CYP1A2 incubations, and the model predicted involvement of both CYP1A2 and CYP1A1.⁵

Together, these results demonstrate the capability of the in silico functionality integrated within a MetID platform to predict Phase I and Phase II enzymatic pathways for LC-MS/MS identified metabolites.

 

You must be logged in to access this content. Not yet registered? Create a new account

 

 

UNCERTAINTY-AWARE LEARNING OF SITES OF METABOLISM FROM LC-MS DATA USING GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS

UNCERTAINTY-AWARE LEARNING OF SITES OF METABOLISM FROM LC-MS DATA USING GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS

June 2026, ISSX 16th European Meeting

Ismael Zamora1; Ramon Adàlia1,2,3

1Mass Analytica, S.L., Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain; 2Lead Molecular Design, SL, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain; 3Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain;

 

Abstract

Predicting sites of metabolism (SoMs) is critical for guiding the design of metabolically stable drug candidates [1], yet early drug discovery relies heavily on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) data that often cannot unambiguously resolve exact atomic positions [2]. Conventional predictive models depend on definitive ground-truth labels, leading to the systematic exclusion of structurally ambiguous but experimentally informative observations. We hypothesized that explicitly modeling this uncertainty, rather than discarding it, would enable robust and practically useful SoM prediction.

To address this, we developed an uncertainty-aware framework in which candidate SoMs derived from LC-MS metabolite identification experiments (MassMetaSite/Oniro platform [3]) are represented as soft atom-level plausibility scores reflecting the frequency of atom involvement across equally scoring structural hypotheses. These scores were aggregated at the parent compound level following expert curation to remove clear artifacts while preserving ambiguity.

To control for label noise, metabolite observations annotating more than 40% of the atoms were excluded, with sensitivity analysis confirming optimal performance near this threshold. The resulting labels were used to train graph neural networks with four graph attention layers [4], incorporating atom-level chemical descriptors and MetaSite7 [5] reactivity features.

Training was formulated as a ranking problem using a pairwise RankNet [6] objective to preserve graded relevance, alongside a top-k-oriented LambdaGap-S+ [7] objective derived from thresholded labels.

On a soft-label human liver microsome dataset, the uncertainty-aware RankNet model with MetaSite7 features achieved strong performance (Spearman correlation 51.23%, NDCG 81.25%), substantially outperforming random and rule-based baselines.

Importantly, models trained exclusively on ambiguous LC-MS data generalized to an external benchmark of experimentally confirmed SoMs, where the LambdaGap-S+ objective achieved up to 75.0% top-2 accuracy on the XenoSite [8] dataset and significantly exceeded random performance.

These results demonstrate that the structural ambiguity inherent to LC-MS metabolite identification can be leveraged as a meaningful training signal rather than treated as a limitation. By aligning machine learning models with the realities of discovery-stage data, this framework enables continuous model development directly from routine metabolite identification workflows without requiring definitive structural elucidation, providing actionable insight into metabolic liability and supporting more efficient drug design.

CITATIONS

  1. Zhang, Z., & Tang, W. (2018). Drug metabolism in drug discovery and development. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 8(5), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.04.003
  2. Castro-Perez, J., & Prakash, C. (2020). Recent advances in mass spectrometric and other analytical techniques for the identification of drug metabolites. In Identification and Quantification of Drugs, Metabolites, Drug Metabolizing Enzymes, and Transporters (pp. 39-71). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820018-6.00002-8
  3. Zamora, I., Fontaine, F., Serra, B., & Plasencia, G. (2013). High-throughput, computer assisted, specific MetID. A revolution for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 10(1), e199-e205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.10.015
  4. Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017). Graph Attention Networks (Version 3). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1710.10903
  5. Cruciani, G., Desantis, J., Palomba, T., Baroni, M., Valeri, A., Siragusa, L., Venturi, L., Zamora, I., Meyer, C., Laboureur, L., Emre, I., & Goracci, L. (2024). Decoding phase I & II human drug metabolism using the prediction tool MetaSite for chemists, medicinal chemists, and metID experts (Manuscript in preparation). Mass Analytica. Retrieved February 4, 2026, from https://mass-analytica.com/products/metasite7/
  6. Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., & Hullender, G. (2005). Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning – ICML’05 (pp. 89-96). ACM Press. The 22nd International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/1102351.1102363
  7. Adalia, R., Sanjuan, G., Margalef, T., & Zamora, I. (2025). The LambdaGap Framework for Precision-Oriented Ranking. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 43(4), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3733235
  8. Zaretzki, J., Matlock, M., & Swamidass, S. J. (2013). XenoSite: Accurately Predicting CYP-Mediated Sites of Metabolism with Neural Networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(12), 3373-3383. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400518g

 

You must be logged in to access this content. Not yet registered? Create a new account